Truth really can be stranger than fiction.

First Page - Now launched! All the stories are true, or based on real events. Unlimited reading for $4.99 / month. No downloads. Read on your phone, tablet or computer.

La verdad puede ser más extraña que la ficción.

First Page - ¡Ya está en marcha! Todas las historias son verídicas, o están basadas en hechos reales. Lectura ilimitada por $4.99 / mes. No hay que descargar nada. Lea en su teléfono, tableta u ordenador.

Manna Minutes Podcast: Eye-opening Bible study in less than five minutes! Access all episodes here.

Manna Minutes en español:

Estudio bíblico que nos hace abrir los ojos en menos de cinco minutos! Acceda a todos los episodios aquí.

Manna Minutes Podcast auf Deutsch:

Augenöffnendes Bibelstudium in weniger als fünf Minuten! Alle Episoden finden Sie hier.

Was There A Curse On Helen's Romantic Life?

The Third Man by Angela Sheffield is based on a true story. Read chapter one now!

View Content By Specific Category

¿Qué tiene que ver conmigo? por Teófila Gottfried

Lo que leemos en la Biblia tiene que ver con todos los seres humanos, sean cristianos o judíos, ateos o agnósticos, budistas, musulmanes o adherentes a alguna de las filosofías o nuevas religiones que surgen en el mundo. ¿Por qué? Ver mayor información sobre este interesante libro.

Scripture of The Day - St. John 14:6

Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

Escritura del día - San Juan 14,6

Jesús le dijo: Yo soy el camino, y la verdad, y la vida; nadie viene al Padre, sino por mí.

Bibelstelle des Tages - Johannes 14,6

Jesus spricht zu ihm: Ich bin der Weg und die Wahrheit und das Leben; niemand kommt zum Vater, denn durch mich!

Evolution Theory and Old Earth Theory Have Been debunked

In 1938, a very strange-looking, large blue fish was caught from the Indian Ocean near Madagascar. It was identified as a crossopterygian fish that is one of the fish from the record of fossils named coelacanth. Evolutionists have affirmed that these fish are ancestors of animals with four limbs and a backbone, which of course, includes man. The problem is that evolution theory taught that crossopterygian fish became extinct 80 million years ago. How then has this fish been found alive in 1938 (Dr. David N. Menton)? This truth is only one in literally hundreds of modern discoveries that are unveiling the absurdity of evolution theory.

The latest claim of “proof” of evolution in the fossilized record of the supposed ancient fish Tiktaalik is simply another desperate attempt to find a record that undeniably shows one life form in the process of evolving into a another. Experts agree that there once may have existed as many as one million different species of fish. This is a profound statement for many reasons. First, with just the thousands of species of fish that are identified, an astounding amount of differences are seen. There are fish with scales and fish without scales. Evolutionists are not claiming that the fish without scales are in the process of developing skin. There are fish that walk such as the walking catfish, but it is not said that they are on their way to becoming land creatures. There are fish that fly hundreds of yards, but evolutionists are not claiming they are evolving into birds. Beta fish have organs similar to lungs that take in oxygen directly from the air. They will drown if unable to come up to the water's surface to breath air. Nevertheless, they are not said to be turning into land animals, and certainly not into people. Why are such claims not being made about these fish? The answer is that scientists know that however diverse they are, they are still fish. Is this not what the Bible had already said when it referred to different "kinds" of the same animal (Genesis 1:21)? A "kind" of an animal is a species of that same animal. Why does evolution education in America's classrooms leave out important discoveries such as the finding of a living fish that, according to evolutionsists, was extinct?

Belief that Earth is billions of years old is crucial to the survival of evolution theory. Before explaining why, we should be aware of the fact that evolutionists have changed Earth's age numerous times over the past 100 years. Here's the tactic: Try to convince people that evolution always takes millions of years to happen, so no one will ever be able to observe it in action. This is a plan for the “perfect” lie. Evolutionists claim that man can know the Earth is billions of years old, because light from stars billions of years away can be seen from Earth. Therefore, Earth must be at least as old as the stars whose light has traveled billions of light years to reach this planet. This sounds logical until hearing how they calculate “light” years. One such method of calculation is known as the Parallax method whose basic concept is simple to understand. Some stars are close to Earth, others are very far away. In the parallax method, scientists start by choosing a star that's close to Earth such as the sun or Alpha Centauri. They then choose the distant star whose distance they're trying to calculate. They look for how the position of the close star changes in relation to the distant star while the Earth is rotating. If the near star's position doesn't change much, the distant star is thought to be very far away. On the other hand, if the near star's position changes a lot, it is believed that the distant star is NOT so distant. A mathematical formula was devised to calculate these distances at the end of the observation.

There are some things very wrong with this method. First, evolutionists believe in the Big Bang theory, which states that all heavenly bodies, including planets and stars, are a spin off from a massive explosion. The theory states that, consequently, the universe is constantly expanding at unimaginable speeds. This means that the Earth, the sun, the close and distant star are all moving at rapid speeds. How can stellar distances be calculated when heavenly bodies won't keep still? What is more is that the Parallax method is performed over a period of six months before calculating a distance. That means six months of rapid expansion takes place during measurement. There's nothing scientific in such haphazard guesswork. And this is only one of the problems with relying on such a method.

There is also a time factor that simply will not allow an intelligent mind to accept stellar distances determined by such haphazard methods. Hollywood's movies about time travelers becoming lost in the past or in the future, do have an element of truth. It is the technology of today's jets that have given man a glimpse into real-life time travel. If a person flies non-stop by jet just across the United States from California to New York, he will cross several time zones. In essence, he becomes a time traveler. A jet can make such a journey in four hours. If his watch says 3:00 p.m. when he leaves California, it will say 7:00 p.m. when he arrives in New York. Nevertheless, the true time in New York will be 10:00 p.m. Although his actual travel time is only four hours, due to the passage through time zones, it will appear as though he made a journey of seven hours. Considering this powerful impact that the passage through time zones has within a small part of the Earth, imagine the huge distortions of the telling of time when speaking of the passage through the time zones of outer space. This telling of "time", along with the inaccurate Parallax method is used to determine as scientific fact that there are stars that are billions of light years away from Earth.

The new Cepheid method of determining stellar distances is said to be improved and absolutely accurate. How can this be when it still relies upon the Parallax method and the telling of time mentioned? This hardly seems a viable argument in favor of evolution's Big Bang, old Earth theory. The physical and scientific evidence that technology allows man to gather is overwhelming in support of an earth whose age is roughly 10,000 years. Technology has allowed for the discovery of many things, but it has limits. Modern man makes use of the most powerful telescopes made, with lenses as thick as 200 inches, yet the stars of the night, however close or far away they may be, appear only as points of light when viewed through these super telescopes. In fact, their appearance does not differ much from what the naked eye can see on a clear and starry night.

Another argument against Creation education is that although one may reject the senseless teachings of evolution, he should not automatically turn to the Bible for scientific teachings. The stated goal of America's educational facilities is to empower students through knowledge of their world, to stimulate them to become tomorrow's great scientists and teachers. Would not such a goal compel one to expose the student to as many valid sources of science-related information as possible? Indeed, this is the case, as long as that source is not God’s Word. Does the Bible contain enough proven scientific fact to be deemed a valid scientific reference book? Yes it does. The amazing facts about the Bible's scientific teachings and statements is that they were made completely without the use of technology in what are considered the "Dark Ages" of man.

This one nation under God should be taught in the classroom the amazing scientific facts about the Bible that cannot be said of any other book in the world. Dinosaurs are described in the Old Testament book of Job beginning at chapter 40 and verse 15, and again in chapter 41 at the first verse. The biblical passages of Genesis 22:17 and Jeremiah 33:22 tell man that the host (stars) of heaven cannot be counted. There is no technology that can tell scientists how many stars are in space. Ecclesiastes 1:6 describes the circulation of the wind as accurately as a meteorologist. Leviticus 17:11 teaches man that the blood is the life of the physical body. It is blood that carries nutrients and oxygen, and life cannot be maintained without it. This is perfect Biology. Genesis 1:11-12, 1:21, and 1:25 describes Biogenesis, which simply states that living things reproduce more living things that are like themselves. In the book of Job, chapter thirty, verses five and six, we have biblical insight to know that there once lived cavemen before any paintings of them were ever found. The biblical passages of Psalm 135:7, Jeremiah 10:13, Job 36:27-29, Ecclesiastes 1:7, and Isaiah 55:10 all speak of hydrology, perfectly describing atmospheric evaporation of water, precipitation, electrical discharges (lightning), and the circulation of water. These passages are so specific that they even tell us plainly that the world's rivers empty into the seas, which is scientifically accurate. Isaiah 40:22 speaks of Earth being round, using the Hebrew word “chuwg”, meaning circuit or compass, spherical or arched in shape. This was written by one of God's prophets during a time when man thought Earth was flat. He had no telescope, so how did he know Earth is a sphere?

This list of the Bible's astoundingly accurate teachings on every branch of science, history, mathematics, and even philosophy is just a tiny sampling of the wisdom God offers. Defenders of evolution education are among the groups who have shown a high level of hypocrisy in that they often claim their opposition to the teaching of Creation science lies in the fact that it is inherently religious, and worse, the Bible is scientifically inaccurate. However, these same defenders gladly accept the offering of other alternatives to evolution such as the ancient myths found in Roman, Egyptian, and Greek mythology. If the Bible is nothing more than a Christian myth, why is it seen as a threat? If the Bible is not scientifically accurate, how are the mythological stories of ancient Egypt, Rome, and Greece scientific? Especially considering the fact that they truly offer no scientific or historical information as we've just seen in biblical Scripture. What would be the difference to the evolutionist between teaching that the God of the Bible created all things, and teaching that the Greek god Zeus is creator? The answer lies in what the rest of the Bible teaches. The problem is that the Bible does not only teach science and history, but also commands men everywhere to repent, and believe the gospel. If the Bible is infallible in its scientific and historical teachings... If all its predictions were fulfilled to the letter, does it not make sense to start to question if it just might also be infallible in its spiritual teachings?

Based on true events, The Third Man by Angela Sheffield, brings the Bible up close and personal as the characters face real issues of life: Betrayal, deceit, romance, bitterness, anger against God, hopelessness, will power, perplexity, triumph, unforgiveness, mental illness, and the "Alcohol made me do it" excuse. Read chapter one FREE now.

Copyright notice: This website and its content is copyright of © Heavenly Manna (HeavenlyManna.net) 2002-2016.

Comments/Comentarios:

Send Comments or a Private Message about One of Our Services / Envíe Comentarios o un Mensaje Privado acerca de nuestros servicios

Once comments reach 10, they close. IF YOU USE PROFANITY, WE WILL REJECT YOUR COMMENT AUTOMATICALLY.
We're a small team, please be patient as we review comments.

Return to content (Regresar a contenidos)

About Us | Become a volunteer | Readers' Comments | Christian Resources | Statement of Faith